<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Done Bright! &#187; alphabetical order</title>
	<atom:link href="http://luminanze.com/blog/tag/alphabetical-order/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://luminanze.com/blog</link>
	<description>the Luminanze Consulting Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 08:49:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>When Alphabetical Order Is Not Logical</title>
		<link>http://luminanze.com/blog/usability/when-alphabetical-order-is-not-logical/</link>
		<comments>http://luminanze.com/blog/usability/when-alphabetical-order-is-not-logical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 07:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UX design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabetical order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luminanze.com/blog/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, the question comes up among interaction designers and usability professionals regarding whether alphabetical order is a logical order. (See, for example, the February 2009 discussion on the Interaction Design list.) We&#8217;ve all seen numerous lists that appear in alphabetical order (and in which it makes sense): country, state, surname, street name, auto [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every so often, the question comes up among interaction designers and usability professionals regarding whether alphabetical order is a logical order. (See, for example, <a href="http://www.ixda.org/discuss.php?post=38149">the February 2009 discussion</a> on the Interaction Design list.) We&#8217;ve all seen numerous lists that appear in alphabetical order (and in which it makes sense): country, state, surname, street name, auto manufacturer. We&#8217;ve also seen many that do not: month, day of week, browser history, File menu.</p>
<p>Alphabetical order is NOT a logical order. It may be the best order for a group of choices — i.e., it may be logical to <em>use</em> alphabetical order — but that does not make the order itself a &#8220;logical&#8221; order. It is only a predictable way of ordering a set that has no intrinsic logical order.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong; predictable is good. And sometimes — e.g., in the situations mentioned above — alphabetical order is the most predictable order.</p>
<p><img style="border: 1px solid #000; float: right; margin: 5px 0px 10px 10px;" src="http://www.luminanze.com/images/blogimages/cartypes.png" alt="" />But sometimes it is not, and yesterday I ran across a perfect example. Consider the figure at right. This is a list of car sizes in the preferences area of a travel application. Does the list look logical to you? I can never remember whether &#8220;economy&#8221; is smaller than &#8220;compact&#8221; or vice versa; and what in the world is &#8220;special&#8221;? I submit that size is the logical order for a choice of sizes (duh!).</p>
<p>Similarly, sequence is the logical order for a choice of months or days of the week. (Would you suggest putting April first? I didn&#8217;t think so.)</p>
<p>The objective is to choose an order that helps people find the option they seek and (if they aren&#8217;t sure) to help them identify the right option. Ordering the car size list by size would do both.</p>
<p>Are you listening, Carlson Wagonlit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://luminanze.com/blog/usability/when-alphabetical-order-is-not-logical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
